Solution

RFQ and Supplier Quotations Into One Comparison

Requirements are read from the RFQ, every supplier quotation is extracted, lines are matched and normalised, and you get a side-by-side comparison with ambiguities flagged for review.

Platform in action

See it working on real documents

A recorded walkthrough of the solution, end to end.

RFQ comparative sheet — product walkthrough

A recorded walkthrough of PrismIQ building a comparative statement from multiple supplier quotations, including line-item normalisation and the recommendation view.

Recorded product walkthrough. Figures shown are sample data.

The problem

Why this process resists automation

Every supplier answers an RFQ in its own format, wording and units. Building a fair comparison means re-typing each quotation and deciding, line by line, whether offers really match the requirement.

  • — Quotations arrive as PDFs, spreadsheets, scans and email text
  • — Suppliers describe the same item differently (e.g. 500 L/min vs 0.5 m³/min)
  • — Lines are merged, split or omitted compared with the RFQ
  • — Currencies, units, delivery and payment terms differ
  • — Spreadsheet errors carry straight into award decisions

Today

How the work happens now

  1. 01RFQ issued and quotations collected by email
  2. 02Each quotation re-keyed into a comparison spreadsheet
  3. 03Lines matched to the RFQ by reading descriptions
  4. 04Units and currencies converted manually
  5. 05Totals re-calculated and checked
  6. 06Comparative statement circulated for approval

How PrismIQ solves it

RFQ & Quotation Comparison with document intelligence

RFQ requirement extraction

Item, quantity, specification, delivery requirement, warranty and commercial terms are read from the RFQ to form the baseline.

Quotation extraction

Supplier, items, quantity, unit and total price, currency, delivery, warranty, payment terms and technical specification are captured from each quotation.

AI-assisted semantic matching

Supplier lines are matched to RFQ lines even when worded differently. Matching is assistive — it does not guarantee technical equivalence, and ambiguous matches go to review.

Normalisation

Capacity, material, unit of measure and currency are normalised to the RFQ baseline, with the original quoted value kept alongside.

Gap and deviation detection

Missing lines, quantity differences, specification deviations and non-compliant terms are flagged per supplier.

Comparative statement

A side-by-side comparison is produced for your committee, with each value linked to its source document. The award decision stays with you.

Documents

Document types handled

Request for quotation (RFQ)Supplier quotations (PDF, Excel, scan)Technical datasheetsCommercial terms and conditionsClarification emails

Extraction

Data captured

  • Item description and specification
  • Quantity and unit of measure
  • Unit price, total price and currency
  • Delivery period and Incoterms
  • Warranty
  • Payment terms
  • Supplier name and quotation reference

Validation

Checks applied to every document

  • Each RFQ line has a matching supplier line, or is flagged as missing
  • Quoted quantities compared with required quantities
  • Line totals equal unit price × quantity
  • Quotation total equals the sum of its lines
  • Specification deviations highlighted for review
  • Delivery and warranty compared with RFQ requirements

Workflow

End-to-end processing flow

  1. 1RFQ and quotations received
  2. 2Requirements extracted from RFQ
  3. 3Each quotation extracted
  4. 4AI-assisted line matching
  5. 5Units and currencies normalised
  6. 6Ambiguous matches reviewed
  7. 7Comparative statement produced

Integration

Where the data goes

ERP procurement module (SAP, Oracle, Dynamics)E-sourcing / tendering platformExcel exportDocument managementREST API and webhooks

Security

Deployment and control

Encryption in transit and at restRole-based access controlComplete audit trailsOn-premise, private cloud or hybrid deploymentConfigurable data retention

Outcomes

What changes for the business

Comparison in hours, not days

Re-keying of supplier quotations is largely removed.

Like-for-like evaluation

Units, currencies and descriptions are normalised before comparison.

Fewer arithmetic errors

Line and quotation totals are recalculated automatically.

Auditable award trail

Every compared value links back to the supplier document.

Outcomes describe the design intent of the solution. Actual results depend on document complexity, workflow design, integration requirements and deployment environment.

Frequently asked questions

Bring RFQ & Quotation Comparison into straight-through processing

Book an enterprise demo and we will walk through your document types, validation rules and integration architecture.